The danger trap
After the muckraking about the Clean Water Act's revision is over, the Republicans have now turned to the long-besieged Endangered Species Act (ESA), which seeks to protect wildlife habitats and frames strict regulations on developing forest areas and wetlands development, known to be the homeground of rare and exotic species. Critics from the paper and timber industries and the land developers' lobby have branded it as a blunt instrument that "ignores human economic needs in favour of absolute protection for often obscure creatures and plants".
Republican senator Slade Gorton introduced a bill in the House of Representatives which, while shielding the endangered species from "harmful" human activities, would allow drastic habitat alteration catering to developmental needs.
An expert panel convened by the National Academy of Sciences in 1992, at the request of Congress, concluded on May 24 in a report that the current law is based on "sound scientific principles".
Related Content
- Advocating for change: a compendium on climate mobility
- Unequal, unprepared, under threat: why bold action against inequalities is needed to end AIDS, stop COVID-19 and prepare for future pandemics
- CSE condemns misrepresentation of findings of recent CSIR study on diesel and CNG buses
- CSE condemns misrepresentation of findings of recent CSIR study on diesel and CNG buses
- Caught in the net: how “net-zero emissions” will delay real climate action and drive land grabs
- Delhi tops the country in fatal road accidents and in number of pedestrians and cyclists falling victim, says new CSE assessment