South Asia
Landmark judgement: For the first time, a UScourt has recognised the potentially disastrous effects of climate change. The California court recently permitted environmental groups Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth and the US cities of Boulder, Colorado, Oakland, Santa Monica and Arcata to sue the Overseas Private Investment Corp and the Export-Import Bank of the United States, two federal government agencies, for aiding climate change. The plaintiffs claim that eight per cent of the world's greenhouse gases come from projects supported by these two agencies and the global warming they cause impacts US communities adversely. They also argue that because of this reason, USA's National Environmental Policy Act, necessitating environmental assessments of proposed development projects in the country, should apply to US-backed overseas projects too.
"This is really the first time a US court has given a plaintiff the right to go to court solely on the global warming issue
Related Content
- Empowering women for effective climate change adaptation: the role of the private sector
- South Asia macro poverty outlook 2024: country-by-country analysis and projections for the developing world
- Addressing the impact of climate change on women farmers’ health in South Asia
- Urgency of heatwave risk management
- Comparative study of carbon rights in the context of jurisdictional REDD+: case studies from Africa, Asia and the Pacific, and Latin America and the Caribbean
- Fossil fuel subsidies and GHG emissions: firm-level empirical evidence from developing Asia